Skip to main content

Now What?

 Now What?

One of the most important roles of the technology coordinator is "to serve as the technology leader for the school or district" (Frazier & Hearrington, 2017, 166). Planning and budgeting for technology wants and needs is a big part of that. Before any new technology is purchased, the technology coordinator must carefully consider how it will be used to directly impact student learning.

The technology coordinator must
  • have and share a district technology vision
  • create an attainable plan for the vision to come to fruition
  • find resources to support the vision  
(Frazier & Hearrington, 2017)

We cannot simply purchase new technology and put it in the hands of students and teachers and expect miracles to happen. How many times have we been given a new device or program to use and thought..."What am I supposed to do with this?"


The solution to this problem is professional development. I'm not talking about the one-and-done PD we've all had before. I am talking about strategic, ongoing professional development. "Professional development on how to use/implement the innovation is important, but so is professional development on how to teach with the innovation" (Frazier & Hearrington, 2017, p. 110). As you can see, that is way too much to try and cram into a faculty meeting, or even a full day workshop. 

The key words that stood out to me from the above infographic were TIME, ONGOING SUPPORT, and TRANSFER. 

Eric Sheninger emphasizes this and states that "if successful change is the goal, then investments have to be made into job-embedded, ongoing professional learning before, during, and consistently after any technology rollout or implementation of large-scale initiatives" (2019, p. 74).

Remember, the goal is not to just have all of the latest and greatest gadgets. The goal is to use technology to make an impact on student achievement. That takes time and focus. The article "8 Steps to Effective Professional Development" explains this further.

3 Phases of Professional Development

There are three phases of effective professional development.
  1. Planning
  2. Implementation
  3. Evaluation

Planning

The perception of teachers is that traditional professional development is ineffective because it is not personal or contextual. Technology coordinators should conduct a needs assessment to determine what PD teachers really want and need. This can be done through a survey or even an interview. Once some specific topics have been identified, the technology coordinator can then begin developing more personalized trainings (Karlin, Ottenbreit-Leftwich, Ozogul, & Liao, 2018). Recently I heard about a school offering 101 and 102 level PD courses for their teachers. What a great way to personalize PD! I also like this idea because each person's time can be spent on developing new skills, and not waste their time on things they already know.

Implementation

PD should be a hands-on experience based in the context of how it is intended to be utilized. Just as we know this is best practice for our students, the same is true for adult learners too. A one-and-done approach is ineffective. Instead, ongoing training supported by a coach is more effective. Learning communities are another great way to ensure PD is more effective because members of the community can work together and support each other (Karlin, Ottenbreit-Leftwich, Ozogul, & Liao, 2018).

Evaluation

The last and most overlooked aspect of tech PD is the evaluation phase. Rather than evaluating the actual presentation, true tech PD evaluation should focus on the change in the teacher's technology integration, as well as the direct impact to student learning. To get a complete picture, data can be collected based on teacher perceptions, classroom observations, student surveys, and achievement scores (Karlin, Ottenbreit-Leftwich, Ozogul, & Liao, 2018).

As you can see, purchasing new technology is just the beginning of the process of effectively integrating technology use by teachers and students.

References

Karlin, M., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Ozogul, G., & Liao, Y. (2018). K-12 technology leaders: Reported practices of technology professional development planning, implementation, and evaluation. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 18(4). https://citejournal.org/volume-18/issue-4-18/current-practice/k-12-technology-leaders-reported-practices-of-technology-professional-development-planning-implementation-and-evaluation

Frazier, M. & Hearrington, D. (2017). The technology coordinator’s handbook (3rd ed). International Society for Technology in Education. 

Giphy. Schitts Creek Comedy GIF by CBC. https://giphy.com/gifs/cbc-schitts-creek-cJMpdj8PNu4pczZWID

Moore, D. (2018, June). 8 steps to effective professional development. The institute for arts integration and STEAM. https://artsintegration.com/2018/06/01/8-steps-effective-professional-development/

Sheninger, E. (2019). Digital leadership: Changing paradigms for changing times (2nd ed). Corwin. 



Comments

  1. Hey, Valerie! I enjoyed reading your post! I think professional development plays an integral part to creating an infused technology learning environment. I like the idea of evaluation because it provides feedback to let the presenter know how to be more effective. Planning is important as well; as the old saying, “ if you fail to plan, you plan to fail.”

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Valerie,
    Such a great blog post. I couldn’t agree more that professional development (PD) is important. It is so frustrating to receive an awesome new tool, but not know how to effectively implement it into my classroom. I loved the infographic you shared. Crawford and Nichol (2021) found that when teachers were provided with long-term PD, there was a significant increase in their self-efficacy, content knowledge, and motivation. This article agrees with your key word of ongoing. It can’t just be a one-and-done PD. I loved how you brought up the evaluation of the implementation of technology and student achievement. As Frazier and Hearrington (2017) state, “results from the assessment help demonstrate whether the technology program is making progress, determine if the investment has been worthwhile, and assist in making adjustments in the way the program is operating” (p. 178). We have to ask ourselves these important questions, and make adjustments so that the technology department is making a positive impact on student achievement.


    References
    Crawford, C., Obenland, C., & Nichol, C. (2021). An analysis of the effect of long-term professional development on teacher engineering self-efficacy and its impact on classroom instruction. Journal of STEM Outreach, 4(1).

    Frazier, M., & Hearrington, D. (2017). The technology coordinator’s handbook (3rd ed.). International Society for Technology in Education.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Valerie,

    I kept nodding as I read your blog post as so many of the points you made, I kept agreeing with. I, like you, agree that ongoing support is crucial when planning professional development. Too often, it is an isolated event that does not reach its full potential. Teachers need consistent support that goes beyond a workshop. Additionally, Davis (2015) states that PD should fit in with the long-term vision for a school or district. Too often it feels disconnected and disjointed. Districts would do better by being intentional about how they plan PD. Fantastic work!

    Andrew Reid

    References


    Davis, V. (2015, April 15). 8 top tips for highly effective PD. George Lucas Educational Foundation. https://www.edutopia.org/blog/top-tips-highly-effective-pd-vicki-davis

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reflection for Improved Crisis Learning

 Reflection      Reflection is one of the most valuable practices effective teachers can do. When I say reflect, I mean real and honest reflection about both negatives and positives. It is easy to identify negatives, but I think we all too often forget to celebrate the successes. No matter what you are reflecting on, when we can identify both areas of strength and areas for improvement, we can build on what went well and make adjustments to make it even better.  Crisis Schooling      What happened with education during the pandemic is no different. In fact, many school districts from across the country took time to systematically reflect and assess what happened in the spring of 2020 before developing a plan for the subsequent school year. ClassLink, a well known name in the education technology field, partnered with other big names such as the Consortium for School Network (CoSN),  and the State Educational Technology Directors Association (...

Is It Really a Good Deal?

Picure it. You are the technology coordinator for your school district. An administrator from one of the schools in your district has raised money for "technology" and would like to purchase student devices that are not on the approved list. The administrator is very excited about the purchase because by choosing this particular device, he feels that he is going to be getting a good deal.  There are some very difficult realities. The devices in question  are not part of the district's technology plan will not stay connected to the current wifi are not compatible with the mobile device manager would require a significant amount of time to set up and manage What do you do? Qualities of a successful technology coordinator include "being an effective communicator, successfully managing personnel, solving problems, seeing the big picture and effective time management" (Frazier and Hearrington, 2017, p. 148). Effective communication will be crucial in this particular ...

The Interactive Class

 The InterACTIVE Class Let's take a trip back in time.     I want you to think back to the most boring class you have ever had. Was it in elementary school, high school, or college? What made it so boring?      For me, it was my 5th grade science class. I LOVED science, but I cannot remember anything we covered in that class. The reason why? My teacher had us independently read a lesson from our book and answer the questions at the end of each section. That was it...everyday!      I think we can all agree what I just described is NOT the most effective way to teach students! My teacher really should have read the book The Interactive Class by Joe and Kristen Merrill. The reason I was drawn to this book was because its description promised to help teachers use technology to make lessons more engaging for elementary students.       As a 3rd grade teacher, I struggle with finding appropriate ways to use technology other...